A Proud Member of the Religious Left

February 7, 2012

Contributors, News Links


Post by Eric R –

As a proud member of the Religious Left – and a Mormon – I understand that membership in the Church does not require a specific, pre-defined stance on important social issues. That said, I am regularly baffled by the vastly different interpretations that some members of my church arrive at on social issues, when ostensibly working with the same set of religious texts and modern-day revelations that serve to guide my own morals and beliefs.

Many social issues, from capital punishment to war, funding for the social safety net to environmental stewardship, are clearly related to Church doctrines and teachings. Yet the second greatest commandment that we have ever been given, to love our neighbors as ourselves, seems to often be absent from the analysis of social issues by the Religious Right, Church members included.

Add to this list the issue of immigration. The NY Times recently ran a story about how the immigration stance of America’s most well-known Mormon, Mitt Romney, is at odds with the official position of the Church.

(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/03/us/politics/romney-immigration-position-at-odds-with-mormon-church.html?_r=1&emc=eta1&pagewanted=all)

The Church recently supported the Utah Compact, a declaration calling for humane treatment of immigrants and condemning deportation policies that separate families. They have also taken the rare step of publically getting involved in the immigration debate, “issu[ing] a series of increasingly explicit statements in favor of allowing some illegal immigrants to stay in the country and work”, and acting as a “…defining factor in passing…immigration legislation” in Utah (which, while far from perfect, was opposed by anti-immigrant groups in the state).

And Romney? Well, lets just say that on this issue he has chosen another tack. He supports the Dream Act, or at least the part that would give citizenship to immigrants who put their lives on the line fighting wars to protect American economic interests, which neither he nor his own sons felt any compulsion to become personally involved with. He slammed Newt Gingrich (and I feel a little nauseous defending the Newt) for suggesting that breaking up families that have been longstanding contributing members of our communities is bad for everyone involved. And he made Rick Perry look reasonable (Perry!) when Perry suggested that undocumented residents who were brought to this country as children should not be punished for their parent’s actions, which Romney pounced on as “amnesty”.

Now I know that I probably shouldn’t read too much into Romney’s stance on immigration, as it is subject to change depending on what crowd he is speaking to, but it makes me wonder how he defines “loving” and “neighbor”. I am not suggesting a free-for-all at the southern border, but I do believe that if Romney, and the rest of the Religious Right, really thought of the brown-skinned, Spanish-speaking foreigners they call “illegals” as their literal brothers and sisters (which our doctrine teaches us they are), they might treat them a little differently than they do now.

Advertisements
, ,

Connect

Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

3 Comments on “A Proud Member of the Religious Left”

  1. Kathy Says:

    I’m assuming that Barney Frank’s description of Romney’s contraction of the “Potomic Ebola Virus” half way through his one and only term as governor of Massachusetts was about the time that Mitt probably received a “personal revelation” that he would one day be president of the United States of America. I have been pondering his predicament. He has had to compromise his every principle in this quest. He is a sad, sad shell of a man. Perhaps it would have been better if he had run as a Democrat. He certainly wouldn’t have been forced to sell his soul the way he has to be accepted by the Republicans.

    • lauraclubfancy Says:

      Well written post! I would also add that ironically our doctrine teaches goes beyond teaching that “illegals” are our brothers and sisters, and includes that they are Lamanite descendants and choice members of the house of Israel.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Holy War | Mormons for Obama - September 14, 2012

    […] where in 2008 Santorum claimed that there is no such thing as a liberal Christian).  So Sorry Eric, you do not […]

%d bloggers like this: